The Sustainability Paradox
Marketers are under increasing pressure to position their products as sustainable. Yet oddly enough, brands that emphasize sustainability too heavily often underperform commercially and in their actual impact. The result? A slower, more frustrating transition to a sustainable consumption pattern – this is the Sustainability Paradox.
A recent meta-review of 94 studies (When Sustainability Backfires) confirms it: consumers don’t always respond positively to bold sustainability messaging. In fact, over-communication can trigger confusion, skepticism, and even backlash.
Let’s unpack what’s going on and how food brands can communicate more effectively without diluting their values.
Intuitively, it makes sense to shout about your product’s sustainable credentials. You’ve invested time and effort in making something better — of course you want to talk about it.
But if the message is too loud or too prominent, unintended side effects kick in:
The market is saturated with green claims. When messaging becomes overwhelming or contradictory, consumers tune out. The result? Your core message gets lost and trust in your brand declines.
If a brand shouts too loudly about sustainability, especially when there’s a gap between words and actions, consumers experience cognitive dissonance. They feel uncomfortable. They question motives. Especially for bigger brands, a legacy misstep can linger in the consumer’s mind. (Think of how FrieslandCampina, one of the biggest dairy companies in the world, once promoted its members as “climate-neutral farms” – a claim that didn’t quite land.)
Labelling a product as “sustainable” can (ironically) lower its appeal. Consumers may assume it’s less tasty, less functional, or less enjoyable. The message unintentionally says: “We sacrificed quality for ethics.” That’s not a compelling offer.
That same review identified three key psychological mechanisms that explain why explicit sustainability messaging often falls flat:
The good news? Cognitive psychology can help. By shifting how we talk about sustainability — not whether we talk about it — brands can avoid the pitfalls and strengthen consumer connection.
Here’s how:
and
Veja — the French sneaker brand — nails it:
In food, a great local example is Lazy Vegan (Netherlands). Their line?
“Ready in 8 minutes. 100% plant-based. No hassle.”
No overloaded claims. No green sermon. Just an effortless, everyday solution for people who care — but don’t want to overthink dinner. The name and packaging are all about ease and comfort, with sustainability as the added bonus.
The paradox is clear: The harder you push the sustainability angle, the more resistance you might face. But with smarter, more psychologically attuned communication, sustainability becomes a quiet strength — not a loud burden.
For food brands, the challenge is not just to be sustainable — but to feel that way to consumers. Without triggering doubt. Without overwhelming. And without making it sound like a trade-off.
Sustainability doesn’t have to be center stage. It just needs to be real.
We believe that understanding consumers is key to making the food system more sustainable. Successful innovation and impactful communication require a solid foundation of consumer insight.
We are the insights partner of choice for food companies and non-profits that aim to have a positive impact on society and our planet. Together we empower consumers to make food choices that are good for them as well as for the planet.
The Hague Tech - Waldorpstraat 5 - 2521CA - The Hague
(+31) (0)70 2042314 - Info@futureoffood.institute
Fill in this form and we'll be in touch shortly!
Do you want to receive a monthly dose of insights, opinions and events? Please subscribe to our newsletter.