Durk Bosma, March 12 2026. Originally published on Marketingfacts.
Marketers today have access to more data, dashboards, and KPIs than ever before. Everything is measured, visualised, and monitored. Yet we realise more and more that more data does not automatically lead to better decisions. When it comes to consumer insights — the essential, real, deep understanding of why people do what they do — marketers often hesitate. Then come the objections: too slow, too expensive, too unreliable.
Honestly, I encounter the objections everywhere. In startups, when speaking to investors, and even in corporates where insights should be deeply embedded in the way of working. The strange thing is: almost all these objections seem logical, but they are not true. In fact, they are symptoms of the very problem that makes insights so necessary.
This one often pops-up among startups and scale-ups where speed is sacred. The result: teams spend months building something consumers ultimately don’t buy. Not because execution was bad, but because no one knew what problem the product was supposed to solve.
The paradox: research is not the bottleneck — lack of insight is the bottleneck. Modern tools — fast concept tests, communities, agile surveys, short qualitative sprints — provide answers within weeks, not months. They prevent exactly the time consuming detours that founders later do have to make time for.
Yes, good research costs money. But doing no research always costs more:
If you don’t know who should buy your product and why, the risk of failure instantly grows. Fortunately, understanding your target audience no longer needs to cost tens of thousands of euros. Fast concept tests, cocreation, online communities — it can all be done for surprisingly modest budgets. The return, in the form of risk reduction, is disproportionately high.
To prove this point, people often quote Henry Ford: “If I had asked people what they wanted, they would have said: a faster horse.”
However, the problem is never the consumer not knowing what they want. In this case, Ford would be asking the wrong question. Good research, rooted in behavioural science, culture, and how people really make choices, reveals patterns that are far more consistent than the intuition of even the smartest entrepreneur.
Consumers are perfectly capable of indicating what need a yet-to-exist solution should fulfill. Don’t expect them to come up with the solution — that’s the marketer’s job.
Intuition is important, but your gut feeling comes with side effects:
Insight is not a replacement for intuition — it is the counterbalance that tests and supplements your intuition. The best marketers combine both: vision and evidence. It prevents endless internal discussions based on opinions (“I think that…”) and creates alignment based on a realistic view of the target audience.
A variant of the previous argument, but a bit more arrogant. People who have worked in a category for years often believe they know the consumer inside out, but market behaviour changes. Cultural codes shift. Brands and categories evolve. Competitors launch competing solutions. Whereas internal knowledge often remains mostly… internal.
Insights provide a reality check. It prevents organisations from slowly but surely believing in their own fantasy world.
Dashboards full of CTRs, viewthrough rates, sales figures, and rotation data create the impression that everything is being monitored. They explain what happens, not why and that is exactly where things often go wrong.
When the numbers are good, you don’t notice it. But when sales decline or campaigns suddenly stop working, you are completely in the dark without insight. Only one strategy remains: guessing. Without proper understanding of your target group, you don’t know what the fundamental problem is, and every optimisation becomes a matter of luck.
You rarely hear this explicitly, but I often sense it. A silent fear that research will undermine the dream. Especially for founders, this is a barrier. Their “baby” is being weighed — and may be deemed too light. That is precisely why they should do research. If your target audience doesn’t embrace your idea, you want to hear that early — not after an expensive launch and years of hard work. You also want to know why.
Insights always give you more than a judgment. They reveal:
In that “why,” the opportunities for improvement lie. Yes, the target audience may completely shoot down your product. That is a tough message you should hear as soon as possible. Mostly, though, research doesn’t kill ideas — it provides the clues to improve your baby and ultimately make it more successful.
Insights are not a luxury, not a delay, not a cost item. They are one of the most powerful tools marketers have to:
Insights no longer require a complicated process reserved for large teams or big budgets. The field has evolved and is surprisingly accessible: fast, smart, and immediately usable. You don’t need months, thick reports, or expensive agencies to get closer to your target audience. Those who think research is a barrier usually discover that it’s actually a stepping stone: toward better decisions, internal alignment, and making choices with more confidence.
We can help you to optimise your product or service, by offering real feedback from real consumers. Find out more here.
We believe that understanding consumers is key to making the food system more sustainable. Successful innovation and impactful communication require a solid foundation of consumer insight.
We are the insights partner of choice for food companies and non-profits that aim to have a positive impact on society and our planet. Together we empower consumers to make food choices that are good for them as well as for the planet.
The Hague Tech - Waldorpstraat 5 - 2521CA - The Hague
(+31) (0)70 2042314 - Info@futureoffood.institute
Fill in this form and we'll be in touch shortly!
Do you want to receive a monthly dose of insights, opinions and events? Please subscribe to our newsletter.